Research smarter with intelligent legal AI
AI understands legal queries and finds relevant precedents instantly
Analyze case precedents and their treatment in subsequent decisions
Find relevant statutes and regulations with legislative history
AI generates summaries of research findings for quick review
AI suggests relevant legal theories and arguments based on research
Store and share research across matters to prevent duplication
See how AI transforms legal research
Associate needs to find cases supporting a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.
"AI provides research: "I found 47 relevant cases on personal jurisdiction dismissals in your state. The leading case is International Shoe v. Washington establishing minimum contacts. For your specific situation involving an out-of-state corporation with limited business here, I found three highly relevant recent cases. Smith v. Tech Corp from 2023 is particularly on point - the court dismissed where the defendant's only contact was a website accessible in the state. I also found that the 9th Circuit ruled last month in Davis v. Online Inc. that passive websites don't establish jurisdiction. I've organized these by relevance and included the key holdings. Want me to pull the specific language you can cite in your motion?""
Attorney needs to understand the latest amendments to employment discrimination laws.
"AI explains changes: "I've researched recent changes to employment discrimination statutes. At the federal level, the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act took effect in June 2023, requiring reasonable accommodations for pregnancy-related conditions. In your state, Senate Bill 1044 amended the state civil rights act effective January 1st, expanding protected classes to include gender identity and expression. I also found three relevant EEOC guidance documents issued in the last six months. For your case involving accommodation requests, the key provisions are Section 4(a) of the new federal act. I can provide a detailed comparison between the old and new requirements, including the interactive process obligations.""
Preparing for trial and need to research opposing attorney's past cases and strategies.
"AI provides intelligence: "I've researched Attorney Johnson's litigation history. She has tried 23 cases in the past five years with a 65% win rate. In employment cases like yours, she has a pattern of filing early summary judgment motions - she's done this in 8 of her last 10 similar cases. In trial, she typically calls an expert witness on industry standards - Dr. Roberts has testified for her in 5 cases. I found transcripts from two similar trials showing her cross-examination style focuses heavily on timeline inconsistencies. She's also filed several discovery motions in past cases, suggesting aggressive discovery practices. Want me to pull the specific motions and orders from her similar cases?""